Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30221 - 30230 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30221 - 30230 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
by a Milwaukee County Court Commissioner in July 2008 in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2008FA4051. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75998 - 2012-01-03
by a Milwaukee County Court Commissioner in July 2008 in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2008FA4051. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75998 - 2012-01-03
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective. O’Keefe also contends that this court should remand this case for a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
was ineffective. O’Keefe also contends that this court should remand this case for a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
[PDF]
WI APP 68
2010 WI APP 68 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1669
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49371 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 68 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1669
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49371 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, we review the findings and conclusions of a zoning authority, not a trial court, and the case does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98639 - 2013-06-27
, we review the findings and conclusions of a zoning authority, not a trial court, and the case does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98639 - 2013-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 908.01. The court also determined the case law holding an attorney’s action constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66240 - 2011-06-20
. Stat. § 908.01. The court also determined the case law holding an attorney’s action constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66240 - 2011-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case both previously entered and any entered pursuant to our directives today. The clerk of this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108979 - 2014-03-12
in this case both previously entered and any entered pursuant to our directives today. The clerk of this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108979 - 2014-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for each alleged period of abandonment. The trial court also noted at that hearing that it found no case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77429 - 2012-01-31
for each alleged period of abandonment. The trial court also noted at that hearing that it found no case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77429 - 2012-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The remaining counts in both cases were dismissed and read in at sentencing.[1] The court imposed the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144355 - 2015-07-14
. The remaining counts in both cases were dismissed and read in at sentencing.[1] The court imposed the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144355 - 2015-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record which would support the court’s decision had it fully exercised its discretion. Id. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24
in the record which would support the court’s decision had it fully exercised its discretion. Id. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94101 - 2013-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94101 - 2013-03-13