Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30231 - 30240 of 65143 for or b.
Search results 30231 - 30240 of 65143 for or b.
[PDF]
WI 7
violated SCR 20:1.4(b).4 By failing to respond to successor counsel's requests for D.B.'s file, Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35291 - 2014-09-15
violated SCR 20:1.4(b).4 By failing to respond to successor counsel's requests for D.B.'s file, Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35291 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33249 - 2014-09-15
: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33249 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
in area within the territory. b. The owners of one-half of the real property in assessed value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2813 - 2017-09-19
in area within the territory. b. The owners of one-half of the real property in assessed value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2813 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
David Hense v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship: a. The lot was created in 1957. b. The lot has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19685 - 2017-09-21
of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship: a. The lot was created in 1957. b. The lot has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19685 - 2017-09-21
State v. Linda Lacey
. Stat. §] 757.69.” Section 757.69(1)(b) authorizes a court commissioner to issue search warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6991 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. §] 757.69.” Section 757.69(1)(b) authorizes a court commissioner to issue search warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brady T. Terrill
the circuit court accepts a plea agreement, not after. As the holding in Comstock states: [B]efore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2902 - 2017-09-19
the circuit court accepts a plea agreement, not after. As the holding in Comstock states: [B]efore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2902 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
value. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3)(b). No. 2021AP6 5 ¶8 In this case, Dr. Bales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364961 - 2021-05-12
value. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3)(b). No. 2021AP6 5 ¶8 In this case, Dr. Bales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364961 - 2021-05-12
[PDF]
David Ott v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. WISCONSIN STAT. § 40.65(2)(b) states, in relevant part: 1. This paragraph applies to participants who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20
. WISCONSIN STAT. § 40.65(2)(b) states, in relevant part: 1. This paragraph applies to participants who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1992). b. K.P.’s argument. ¶17 K.P. argues that it was an erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192668 - 2017-09-21
(Ct. App. 1992). b. K.P.’s argument. ¶17 K.P. argues that it was an erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terrance D. Prude
[the sentence], and that is why I didn’t worry about it.” Prude testified that he pled guilty “[b]ecause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25065 - 2017-09-21
[the sentence], and that is why I didn’t worry about it.” Prude testified that he pled guilty “[b]ecause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25065 - 2017-09-21