Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30231 - 30240 of 64955 for or b.
Search results 30231 - 30240 of 64955 for or b.
David Hense v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship: a. The lot was created in 1957. b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19685 - 2005-09-19
enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship: a. The lot was created in 1957. b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19685 - 2005-09-19
State v. Kenneth Simmons
general, and Carol B. Nawrocki, assistant attorney general. There was oral argument by Carol B. Nawrocki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12684 - 2005-03-31
general, and Carol B. Nawrocki, assistant attorney general. There was oral argument by Carol B. Nawrocki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12684 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David J. Hoffman v. J. Daniel Benson
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Vilas County: JAMES B. MOHR, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10277 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Vilas County: JAMES B. MOHR, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10277 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is not entitled to relief on this basis. See Phillips, 322 Wis. 2d 576, ¶17. B. Cornejo was not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
is not entitled to relief on this basis. See Phillips, 322 Wis. 2d 576, ¶17. B. Cornejo was not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a district attorney under s. 978.05 (8) (b), or served as a special prosecutor under s. 978.045
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239679 - 2019-04-30
of a district attorney under s. 978.05 (8) (b), or served as a special prosecutor under s. 978.045
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239679 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
in area within the territory. b. The owners of one-half of the real property in assessed value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2815 - 2017-09-19
in area within the territory. b. The owners of one-half of the real property in assessed value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2815 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66242 - 2011-06-21
will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66242 - 2011-06-21
State v. Francis E. Altman
of the tape. Interception and use of the evidence, however, was authorized under Wis. Stat. § 968.29(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
of the tape. Interception and use of the evidence, however, was authorized under Wis. Stat. § 968.29(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. §§ 940.06(1) & 939.63(1)(b). Perry also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115772 - 2014-06-30
. Stat. §§ 940.06(1) & 939.63(1)(b). Perry also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115772 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
The first question is whether the Club is entitled to recreational immunity under Wis. Stat. § 895.52(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34055 - 2008-09-15
The first question is whether the Club is entitled to recreational immunity under Wis. Stat. § 895.52(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34055 - 2008-09-15