Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30251 - 30260 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Marvin L. Hereford
69, 72-73 (1996). The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13971 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 584, 469 N.W.2d 163 (1991). “While the ‘fair and just’ reason test is a liberal test, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208813 - 2018-02-27

[PDF] State v. Gerald A. Edson
-pronged test is used to analyze questions of multiplicity. State v. Hirsch, 140 Wis.2d 468, 471, 410 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20

State v. Jeffrey L. Loranger
satisfied this test by showing that the affidavit failed to point out the limitations of the electrical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3380 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Company
in that case, it is unclear whether that is the formulation of the Huron Tool test the court would embrace
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1242 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gary E. Wolfgram
defendant a fair trial.4 See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 684-86. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11435 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Dale E. Hertzfeld
supreme court has held that: The proper standard for the test of relevancy on cross- examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2362 - 2017-09-19

State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
items such as razor blades, Advil and pregnancy tests from the pharmacy departments of large retail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15802 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gerald A. Edson
, 534, 470 N.W.2d 322, 327 (Ct. App. 1991). A two-pronged test is used to analyze questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tony J. Gray
The United States Supreme Court set forth the federal test for admission of conditionally relevant evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3233 - 2005-03-31