Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30251 - 30260 of 58277 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Wallace A. Stellrecht v. Donald W. Gudmanson
habeas corpus relief. The trial court concluded that one of Stellrecht’s trial attorneys, Owen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2499 - 2017-09-19

Dolores Haas v. Thomas J. Berube
misused its discretion by failing to grant her Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(b) motion for a new trial. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2262 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
no contact with her and is innocent. Harvey also argued that both trial and postconviction counsel were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849464 - 2024-09-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
presided over the jury trial and sentencing in this matter. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908247 - 2025-02-04

[PDF] State v. James J. Wardell
effective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that he did and therefore affirm. NO. 96-0999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10653 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in determining that Hollins did not demonstrate a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194918 - 2017-09-21

William Trombello v. Blue Sky Harbor Limited Partnership
. Schmeiser argues that the trial court failed to follow appropriate summary judgment procedure and improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3526 - 2005-03-31

David C. Zugenbuehler v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that there was a legitimate doubt as to how his injury was sustained. On appeal, the trial court reversed, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8581 - 2005-03-31

Teresa L. v. Sauk County
to grant a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. First, the evidence must have come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8100 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William F. Baskin
challenges the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion. 1 We reverse. I. ¶2 At 6:00 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3992 - 2017-09-20