Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30291 - 30300 of 61719 for does.

COURT OF APPEALS
. The State did not argue at the suppression hearing, and does not argue now, that Trooper Larsen had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123499 - 2014-10-08

[PDF] NOTICE
that Crawford, decided in 2004, is a recent case, Crawford does not apply to Townsend’s case, and even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35050 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Brian J. Maas
to the warrant requirement, recognizing that the Fourth Amendment does not bar a government official from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6249 - 2017-09-19

David Gunderman v. Jack Hartwig
the value of Gunderman’s services. He does not challenge the court’s finding that Gunderman’s services have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16157 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Westridge Builders, Inc. v. Linda A. Fridlington
the money and apply it on whatever larger damages he can establish. The contract does not so provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2631 - 2017-09-19

State v. Dawn L. Bogumill
, Bogumill does not assert that the classification involved in the operating after revocation statute affects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4624 - 2005-03-31

Olga Rico v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
. However, such inconsistency does not make his testimony incredible; it merely creates a credibility issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6860 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David L. Geyer
300, 308 (1986). Probable cause to arrest does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt or even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14939 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Darnial C. Craig
does not establish ineffectiveness. A curative instruction may not always accomplish its purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2860 - 2017-09-19

State v. Steven W. Nielson
a preliminary breath test, but if he does so, the refusal can be used as an inference of guilt. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5885 - 2005-03-31