Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30291 - 30300 of 57351 for id.

State v. Collin D. Jones
of reasonably competent professional judgment. Id. at 636-37, 369 N.W.2d at 716. Whether counsel’s behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11415 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
… there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” Id., ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28281 - 2007-03-05

Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
interpretation is more reasonable. Id. ¶5 In this case, LIRC concluded that Hutchinson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5973 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the specific facts of a given case.” Id. DISCUSSION ¶5 In this case, Kennedy asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26867 - 2006-10-23

COURT OF APPEALS
professional norms. Id. at 688. To prove prejudice, a “defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98006 - 2013-06-10

State v. Michael G. Ehlers
spilled out. Id. at 349, 357-59, 297 N.W.2d at 4, 8-9. The court believed a search of the purse's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8897 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
harm. Id. The State’s argument and the court’s characterization of King’s representation of mutual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31422 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and, if so, (2) whether the inmate should be granted parole.” Id., ¶12. Thus, a determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249808 - 2019-11-06

State v. Randolph O. Neumeyer
the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Id. at 544, 543 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10206 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor justifies sentence modification is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102466 - 2013-09-30