Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30291 - 30300 of 57351 for id.

State v. Gerald Wills
for the trier of fact. Id. at 397, 359 N.W.2d at 154-55 (citation omitted). We limit our review to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8554 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
when a sentence is based on irrelevant or improper factors. Id. The three primary factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112729 - 2014-05-18

COURT OF APPEALS
without deference. Id. ¶7 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32178 - 2008-03-24

COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional right. See id. The relevant inquiry is fact specific, and the plaintiff must point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111433 - 2014-05-05

Scott F. Frohwirth v. Stephen Puckett
or determination in question. See id. ANALYSIS ¶6 Frohwirth claims it was improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2192 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William C. Bubolz
or unjustifiable basis for its sentence. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8245 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Oakfield Stone Company v. Neil Hobbs
court order granting summary judgment. Id. Whether an insurer has a duty to defend depends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8369 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 939.617(2)(b). Id. (emphasis added). Like Holcomb, Reigle is far older than the victims and thus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176209 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.’” Id., ¶40 (citation omitted). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98489 - 2013-06-24

COURT OF APPEALS
and complaint “made the omitted time for filing an answer conspicuous by its absence.” Id. at 373. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33768 - 2008-08-18