Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Joan A. German v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0250 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13560 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0250 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13560 - 2017-09-21
Maranatha Baptist Church v. City of Phillips
. The trial court held that the church was a permitted use under the City's commercial zoning code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13169 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court held that the church was a permitted use under the City's commercial zoning code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13169 - 2005-03-31
Anita Gartz v. J&J Association Holding, LLC
former landlord, J&J Association Holding, LLC, (J&J) seeking double damages pursuant to Wis. Admin. Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6708 - 2005-03-31
former landlord, J&J Association Holding, LLC, (J&J) seeking double damages pursuant to Wis. Admin. Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6708 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard Seider v. Connie O'Connell
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1223 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1223 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
Richard Seider v. Connie O'Connell
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13953 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13953 - 2005-03-31
Timothy L. Hartwich v. Michelle M. Peterson
order first. O’Connell alleges the support award in the present case: (1) is fundamentally unfair; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25000 - 2006-05-01
order first. O’Connell alleges the support award in the present case: (1) is fundamentally unfair; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25000 - 2006-05-01
[PDF]
Timothy L. Hartwich v. Michelle M. Peterson
. O’Connell alleges the support award in the present case: (1) is fundamentally unfair; (2) is based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25000 - 2017-09-21
. O’Connell alleges the support award in the present case: (1) is fundamentally unfair; (2) is based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25000 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
districts to fifty-five feet. ¶4 Soon after, the City revised its municipal code. The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35412 - 2009-02-03
districts to fifty-five feet. ¶4 Soon after, the City revised its municipal code. The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35412 - 2009-02-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
are entitled to both qualified and absolute immunity. It also argues that, on the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50650 - 2014-09-15
are entitled to both qualified and absolute immunity. It also argues that, on the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50650 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that, on the facts of this case, Henke and Clarson are not entitled to declaratory or injunctive relief regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50650 - 2010-07-15
that, on the facts of this case, Henke and Clarson are not entitled to declaratory or injunctive relief regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50650 - 2010-07-15