Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, MUN. CODE ch. 26, art. II (2007). Despite being denied an exemption and without applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106847 - 2017-09-21
, MUN. CODE ch. 26, art. II (2007). Despite being denied an exemption and without applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106847 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of Raymond, Wis, Mun. Code ch. 26, art. II (2007). Despite being denied an exemption and without applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106847 - 2014-01-21
of Raymond, Wis, Mun. Code ch. 26, art. II (2007). Despite being denied an exemption and without applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106847 - 2014-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as defined in the Waukesha Municipal Code to reside in his single-family dwelling. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255485 - 2020-03-04
as defined in the Waukesha Municipal Code to reside in his single-family dwelling. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255485 - 2020-03-04
Shawn Carlson v. Frank B. Gleichsner
While we do not find any published cases interpreting Wis. Admin. Code § Trans 139.03(1), Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7529 - 2005-03-31
While we do not find any published cases interpreting Wis. Admin. Code § Trans 139.03(1), Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7529 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shawn Carlson v. Frank B. Gleichsner
Gleichsner first asserts that the trial court erred in its interpretation of WIS. ADMIN. CODE § TRANS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7529 - 2017-09-19
Gleichsner first asserts that the trial court erred in its interpretation of WIS. ADMIN. CODE § TRANS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7529 - 2017-09-19
Must a judge testify when subpoenaed?
case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character. The judge is not hearing the case
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=903 - 2005-03-31
case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character. The judge is not hearing the case
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=903 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
real property construction activity. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns a Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
real property construction activity. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns a Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
This case concerns a Department of Revenue assessment of sales and use taxes against Visu-Sewer. Visu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30503 - 2014-09-15
This case concerns a Department of Revenue assessment of sales and use taxes against Visu-Sewer. Visu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
them to pay the Kuwabaras the amount it cost the Kuwabaras to make the home code compliant as set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52581 - 2014-09-15
them to pay the Kuwabaras the amount it cost the Kuwabaras to make the home code compliant as set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52581 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the Kuwabaras to make the home code compliant as set forth in the offer to purchase. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52581 - 2010-07-27
the Kuwabaras to make the home code compliant as set forth in the offer to purchase. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52581 - 2010-07-27