Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 68445 for did.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 68445 for did.
James Lammers v. James Labell
Lammers to file a brief responding to the motion by April 3, 1995. Lammers did not file a brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11730 - 2005-03-31
Lammers to file a brief responding to the motion by April 3, 1995. Lammers did not file a brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rudolfo Briseno
that they did not have to leave and he was willing to talk to them. Special Agent Smith stated that he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9408 - 2017-09-19
that they did not have to leave and he was willing to talk to them. Special Agent Smith stated that he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9408 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth Korotka
suppressed because the detective did not honor Korotka’s invocation of his right to silence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15589 - 2005-03-31
suppressed because the detective did not honor Korotka’s invocation of his right to silence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rosa J. Vasquez v. Willie Henderson
in denying her motion to amend the complaint to add the strict liability claim. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8158 - 2017-09-19
in denying her motion to amend the complaint to add the strict liability claim. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8158 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to thirty-five years in prison.[2] Mosley did not appeal the conviction. In 2006, Mosley moved to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33843 - 2008-09-02
to thirty-five years in prison.[2] Mosley did not appeal the conviction. In 2006, Mosley moved to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33843 - 2008-09-02
State v. Keyonta T. Williams
thinking was impaired. Williams did not seek a new trial on the finding of guilt but asked that an NGI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4735 - 2005-03-31
thinking was impaired. Williams did not seek a new trial on the finding of guilt but asked that an NGI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4735 - 2005-03-31
Marian R. Crosswhite v. Deborah L. Zivko
on June 1, 1995. Crosswhite testified that she did not intend for the stocks to be a present gift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9495 - 2005-03-31
on June 1, 1995. Crosswhite testified that she did not intend for the stocks to be a present gift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9495 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and did not consider mitigating factors that supported a lighter sentence. We reject this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86886 - 2012-09-10
and did not consider mitigating factors that supported a lighter sentence. We reject this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86886 - 2012-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
election. The WEC issued a written decision on May 2, 2022, stating that it “[did] not find probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815670 - 2024-06-25
election. The WEC issued a written decision on May 2, 2022, stating that it “[did] not find probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815670 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Montell Green
for cocaine, weapons, and related items. The search warrant did not authorize the search of all persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11039 - 2017-09-19
for cocaine, weapons, and related items. The search warrant did not authorize the search of all persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11039 - 2017-09-19

