Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 29410 for er.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 29410 for er.
Frontsheet
-assault conviction, the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying Strickland's "objective
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35710 - 2009-03-02
-assault conviction, the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying Strickland's "objective
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35710 - 2009-03-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. On appeal, Maclin-Dyson raises only one argument: whether the circuit court erred when it joined the two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316087 - 2020-12-22
. On appeal, Maclin-Dyson raises only one argument: whether the circuit court erred when it joined the two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316087 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial brief constitutes “newly discovered evidence”; and (4) that the circuit court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118300 - 2014-09-15
trial brief constitutes “newly discovered evidence”; and (4) that the circuit court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David T. Hall
erred when it concluded that he did not establish the existence of a new factor warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19622 - 2017-09-21
erred when it concluded that he did not establish the existence of a new factor warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19622 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Waupaca v. Samuel J. Hyland
. The State contends that the trial court erred in determining that the State had not met its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2469 - 2017-09-19
. The State contends that the trial court erred in determining that the State had not met its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2469 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The first is that the circuit court erred in denying his suppression motion. The motion challenged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159234 - 2017-09-21
. The first is that the circuit court erred in denying his suppression motion. The motion challenged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159234 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the International Association for Clear Thinking. The Durchslags argue the circuit court erred by deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12
of the International Association for Clear Thinking. The Durchslags argue the circuit court erred by deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31112 - 2007-12-10
, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31112 - 2007-12-10
State v. Michael S. Alberts, Jr.
in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3724 - 2005-03-31
in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3724 - 2005-03-31
David A. Schlemm v. Matthew Frank
that the adjustment committee erred by deciding to give “little weight” to written statements he provided from other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19277 - 2005-08-10
that the adjustment committee erred by deciding to give “little weight” to written statements he provided from other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19277 - 2005-08-10