Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 24556 for extending.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 24556 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
in case No. 2010CF5855, is thirty months’ initial confinement and thirty-six months’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101937 - 2013-09-16
in case No. 2010CF5855, is thirty months’ initial confinement and thirty-six months’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101937 - 2013-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
his sentence of twenty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34314 - 2008-10-14
his sentence of twenty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34314 - 2008-10-14
State v. James Welch
, and therefore did not need to be supported by probable cause; and the use of the dog did not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5123 - 2005-03-31
, and therefore did not need to be supported by probable cause; and the use of the dog did not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5123 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of initial confinement and extended supervision, provided Thornton cooperate fully and truthfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36599 - 2009-05-26
of initial confinement and extended supervision, provided Thornton cooperate fully and truthfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36599 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
also involves a challenge to the court’s denial of a motion to extend the time for filing a response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27023 - 2014-09-15
also involves a challenge to the court’s denial of a motion to extend the time for filing a response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27023 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel E.
was not properly notified of a No. 99-2592 2 request to extend a CHIPS1 order in an earlier proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16063 - 2017-09-21
was not properly notified of a No. 99-2592 2 request to extend a CHIPS1 order in an earlier proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the crime charged, the State would recommend three years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90590 - 2014-09-15
to the crime charged, the State would recommend three years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90590 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
to recommend a total sentence of three years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91496 - 2013-01-08
to recommend a total sentence of three years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91496 - 2013-01-08
State v. Jesse Ruiz
, divided into equal five-year periods of confinement and extended supervision. After the summary rejection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
, divided into equal five-year periods of confinement and extended supervision. After the summary rejection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed consecutive terms of six years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237309 - 2019-03-11
imposed consecutive terms of six years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237309 - 2019-03-11