Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 27533 for go.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 27533 for go.
State v. Eddie L. Thomas
that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Id. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15352 - 2005-03-31
that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Id. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15352 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eddie L. Thomas
that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Id. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31
that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Id. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frederick F.
:05 a.m. to notify personnel that Frederick was going to be late. She also testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15250 - 2005-03-31
:05 a.m. to notify personnel that Frederick was going to be late. She also testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15250 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
so “[b]asically for officer safety. With the type of thing that was going on and the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
so “[b]asically for officer safety. With the type of thing that was going on and the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
] that stop sign, … just slowed briefly and kept going through the intersection, never came to a complete
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247394 - 2019-09-23
] that stop sign, … just slowed briefly and kept going through the intersection, never came to a complete
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247394 - 2019-09-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
- in-law’s affidavit which claimed ownership of some items of personal property because Steven would go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30820 - 2014-09-15
- in-law’s affidavit which claimed ownership of some items of personal property because Steven would go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30820 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steve Norton
it was going to be revoked was highly relevant to sentencing. The trial court focused on imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31
it was going to be revoked was highly relevant to sentencing. The trial court focused on imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” At that point, the officer testified that he “advised [his] partners that [he] was going to go make a stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241304 - 2019-05-29
.” At that point, the officer testified that he “advised [his] partners that [he] was going to go make a stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241304 - 2019-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of personal property because Steven would go to farm auctions and “bring home stuff.” Sometimes, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30820 - 2007-11-07
of personal property because Steven would go to farm auctions and “bring home stuff.” Sometimes, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30820 - 2007-11-07
[PDF]
State v. Joshua B.
.” She also said he was fully clothed and was “also going up and down on top of me.” She yelled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25985 - 2017-09-21
.” She also said he was fully clothed and was “also going up and down on top of me.” She yelled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25985 - 2017-09-21