Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 65360 for or b.

[PDF] State v. Donald R. Wield
2 strikes” law, WIS. STAT. § 939.62(2m)(a)1m, (b)2 and (c) (2001-02), 1 after a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5584 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Department of Regulation & Licensing v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
, 1986, “Patient B” was referred to Dr. Farley at St. Michael’s Hospital for a barium enema single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12091 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jim Walter Color Separations v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
harassment. They contend that LIRC’s interpretation of § 111.36(1)(b), STATS., is correct—that the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14389 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 39
as a consequence of his actions giving rise to Cases B and C discussed below. As a result of the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28186 - 2014-09-15

State v. Donald R. Wield
strikes” law, Wis. Stat. § 939.62(2m)(a)1m, (b)2 and (c) (2001-02),[1] after a conviction of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5584 - 2005-03-31

Department of Regulation & Licensing v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
that can be perceived.” The board also found that on December 5, 1986, “Patient B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12091 - 2005-03-31

Jim Walter Color Separations v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that LIRC’s interpretation of § 111.36(1)(b), Stats., is correct—that the statute does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14389 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 39
, Hines’s probation was revoked, in part as a consequence of his actions giving rise to Cases B and C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28186 - 2007-03-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO Z. B., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: DANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210974 - 2018-04-09

[PDF] State v. Leo E. Wanta
: MICHAEL B. TORPHY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ROGGENSACK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21