Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
NOTICE
“that the prosecution be prohibited from any use or reference to any recorded statements made by the defendant, or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32972 - 2014-09-15
“that the prosecution be prohibited from any use or reference to any recorded statements made by the defendant, or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32972 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William Napper
eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound of gunshots woke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8365 - 2017-09-19
eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound of gunshots woke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for exercising his First Amendment rights, which appears to be a retaliatory prosecution claim. In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
for exercising his First Amendment rights, which appears to be a retaliatory prosecution claim. In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2023AP790-CR 10 ¶20 The parties agree that, in an incest prosecution, the “uncle” evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939298 - 2025-04-16
. No. 2023AP790-CR 10 ¶20 The parties agree that, in an incest prosecution, the “uncle” evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939298 - 2025-04-16
State v. William Napper
, Smith's eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
, Smith's eyewitness testimony was central to the prosecution's case. She testified that the sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
clause. The confrontation clause provides "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31
clause. The confrontation clause provides "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin T. Holtet
perjured and inherently incredible testimony in his prosecution and that the real controversy was not fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8073 - 2005-03-31
perjured and inherently incredible testimony in his prosecution and that the real controversy was not fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8073 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara E. Harp
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20087 - 2005-12-11
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20087 - 2005-12-11
State v. Roger L. Warren
under § 946.31(1)(c), Stats., be brought as a single count or as a single "unit of prosecution." See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
under § 946.31(1)(c), Stats., be brought as a single count or as a single "unit of prosecution." See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene P. Opalewski
was not prosecuted but, in the latter, he was prosecuted, was convicted, and served a prison term. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
was not prosecuted but, in the latter, he was prosecuted, was convicted, and served a prison term. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31