Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 63530 for records.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 63530 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
responded and made a digital recording of the answering machine messages. Contrary to Henson’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56806 - 2010-11-15
responded and made a digital recording of the answering machine messages. Contrary to Henson’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56806 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832723 - 2024-07-31
denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832723 - 2024-07-31
State v. Jeffrey Townsend
of the record is factually deficient to permit meaningful review, we remand this case to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6169 - 2005-03-31
of the record is factually deficient to permit meaningful review, we remand this case to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the court award of $10,000 to Phalin for damages was not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146650 - 2017-09-21
argues that the court award of $10,000 to Phalin for damages was not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146650 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174937 - 2017-09-21
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174937 - 2017-09-21
David J. Winkel v. Jeanette M. Wilke
. However, Winkel fails to cite to any portion of the appellate record revealing where, when or how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
. However, Winkel fails to cite to any portion of the appellate record revealing where, when or how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
on April 26 and recorded with the register of deeds on April 28. On November 9, 1999, the City razed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20
on April 26 and recorded with the register of deeds on April 28. On November 9, 1999, the City razed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court award of $10,000 to Phalin for damages was not supported by the record and that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19
that the court award of $10,000 to Phalin for damages was not supported by the record and that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
competency to adjudicate [his] case when it failed to make a verbatim record of [his] probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149581 - 2017-09-21
competency to adjudicate [his] case when it failed to make a verbatim record of [his] probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149581 - 2017-09-21
State v. James R. Bolstad
. Based upon our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8483 - 2005-03-31
. Based upon our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8483 - 2005-03-31