Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 3031 - 3040 of 58245 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Rosemary Owen v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
(1) a new trial No. 95-2644 -2- due to various discovery and evidentiary errors; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9723 - 2017-09-19
(1) a new trial No. 95-2644 -2- due to various discovery and evidentiary errors; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9723 - 2017-09-19
Rosemary Owen v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
with Society's insured, John Hajewski. Society requests (1) a new trial due to various discovery and evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9723 - 2005-03-31
with Society's insured, John Hajewski. Society requests (1) a new trial due to various discovery and evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wendy Pero v. Donald Lucas
of his son William. 1 He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25088 - 2017-09-21
of his son William. 1 He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25088 - 2017-09-21
Wendy Pero v. Donald Lucas
placement of his son William.[1] He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25088 - 2006-06-27
placement of his son William.[1] He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25088 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. First, Dengsavang claims his trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) opening the door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168980 - 2017-09-21
relief. First, Dengsavang claims his trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) opening the door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168980 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jimmy D. Lamon
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial. Lamon argues (1) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9596 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial. Lamon argues (1) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9596 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy D. Lamon
his motion for a new trial. No. 95-2393-CR -2- Lamon argues (1) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9596 - 2017-09-19
his motion for a new trial. No. 95-2393-CR -2- Lamon argues (1) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9596 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 ΒΆ1 DUGAN, J. Theophilous Ruffin appeals a judgment of conviction and an order from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
2 ΒΆ1 DUGAN, J. Theophilous Ruffin appeals a judgment of conviction and an order from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court sentenced Deffke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9073 - 2017-09-19
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court sentenced Deffke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9073 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher D. Smith
sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court imposed an unduly and disparately harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21187 - 2006-02-06
sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court imposed an unduly and disparately harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21187 - 2006-02-06