Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30301 - 30310 of 68875 for he.
Search results 30301 - 30310 of 68875 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Gregory L. Hoover
of first-degree sexual assault, and two counts of battery. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2135 - 2017-09-19
of first-degree sexual assault, and two counts of battery. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2135 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joanne Sekula
Prokop testified that on April 7, 2000, at approximately 4:00 a.m., he was dispatched to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3712 - 2017-09-19
Prokop testified that on April 7, 2000, at approximately 4:00 a.m., he was dispatched to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3712 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
––failure to prosecute––was in error. He has failed to so do. We further note that, given Prouty’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486030 - 2022-02-23
––failure to prosecute––was in error. He has failed to so do. We further note that, given Prouty’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486030 - 2022-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the suppression hearing. Kastens testified he was sitting in his squad car in a “Park and Ride” in Roberts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167747 - 2017-09-21
at the suppression hearing. Kastens testified he was sitting in his squad car in a “Park and Ride” in Roberts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167747 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 346.63. He argues that the State violated his right to be free from unreasonable seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38160 - 2009-07-22
. Stat. § 346.63. He argues that the State violated his right to be free from unreasonable seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38160 - 2009-07-22
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. William D. Whitnall
Whitnall ordering him to answer within 20 days. He did not answer and on May 22, 2000, the Board filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16384 - 2017-09-21
Whitnall ordering him to answer within 20 days. He did not answer and on May 22, 2000, the Board filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16384 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carolyn G.
without “clear and convincing” evidence that he failed to assume parental responsibility. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5013 - 2017-09-19
without “clear and convincing” evidence that he failed to assume parental responsibility. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5013 - 2017-09-19
State v. James E. Gray
exercised its discretion by admitting other-acts evidence which he claims was irrelevant and prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion by admitting other-acts evidence which he claims was irrelevant and prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his no contest pleas after the evidentiary hearing. Ramirez contends that he is entitled to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71317 - 2011-09-27
his no contest pleas after the evidentiary hearing. Ramirez contends that he is entitled to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71317 - 2011-09-27
2009 WI APP 107
or probation was ever revoked, he would get the maximum sentence. Goodson’s extended supervision was revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36536 - 2009-07-28
or probation was ever revoked, he would get the maximum sentence. Goodson’s extended supervision was revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36536 - 2009-07-28