Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 83344 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
of § 895.52. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that § 895.52 applies in this case and grants Sundog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138329 - 2015-03-25
of § 895.52. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that § 895.52 applies in this case and grants Sundog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138329 - 2015-03-25
[PDF]
State v. Alan Thomas LaPean
, with ONE COUNT OF SUBSTANTIAL BATTERY, in violation of § 940.19(2) of the Wisconsin Statutes, in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7386 - 2017-09-20
, with ONE COUNT OF SUBSTANTIAL BATTERY, in violation of § 940.19(2) of the Wisconsin Statutes, in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7386 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, the small claims court held: [O]ne family member, and I will make that ruling in this case, owns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118317 - 2014-07-28
, the small claims court held: [O]ne family member, and I will make that ruling in this case, owns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118317 - 2014-07-28
WI App 33 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1092 Complete Title of...
2015 WI App 33 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1092 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138279 - 2015-04-28
2015 WI App 33 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1092 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138279 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
State v. Scott T. Bidwell
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
modification because the cases were not comparable. The court reasoned that because of differences between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-24
modification because the cases were not comparable. The court reasoned that because of differences between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-24
[PDF]
WI 8
2012 WI 8 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP1700-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77946 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI 8 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP1700-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77946 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The charges in this case began with a reported incident in which Mary2 described a domestic dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870700 - 2024-11-05
The charges in this case began with a reported incident in which Mary2 described a domestic dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870700 - 2024-11-05
2007 WI APP 234
2007 WI App 234 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1127-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30735 - 2007-11-27
2007 WI App 234 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1127-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30735 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
and justifiable excuse for the party’s noncompliance. In the instant case, the municipal court failed to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21
and justifiable excuse for the party’s noncompliance. In the instant case, the municipal court failed to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21