Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 83344 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a “MOTION TO INCLUDE THIRD PARTY LIABILITY,” arguing that this case and a different 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13
filed a “MOTION TO INCLUDE THIRD PARTY LIABILITY,” arguing that this case and a different 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
that corroborated witnesses’ testimony, and physical evidence in the form of shell casings that linked Bowens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107616 - 2014-02-03
that corroborated witnesses’ testimony, and physical evidence in the form of shell casings that linked Bowens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107616 - 2014-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: 1 The small claims case was presided over by the Honorable Mary Kuhnmuench. No. 2013AP2183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118317 - 2014-09-15
: 1 The small claims case was presided over by the Honorable Mary Kuhnmuench. No. 2013AP2183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
and pled not guilty. His case was tried to a jury, which found him guilty. He was sentenced to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
and pled not guilty. His case was tried to a jury, which found him guilty. He was sentenced to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 82
2013 WI APP 82 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97397 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI APP 82 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97397 - 2014-09-15
John W. Ernst, v. Berndt Buick Company
fact is in dispute. Therefore, we reverse the order and the judgment and remand the case for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8786 - 2005-03-31
fact is in dispute. Therefore, we reverse the order and the judgment and remand the case for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carlton Maruki Jones
a reasonable explanation for imposing “near maximum” sentences. Based on our review of this case, we cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17664 - 2017-09-21
a reasonable explanation for imposing “near maximum” sentences. Based on our review of this case, we cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17664 - 2017-09-21
State v. Syed Hasan Turab
for their case. Next, Turab contends the trial court erred in its conclusion that the statements of the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10084 - 2005-03-31
for their case. Next, Turab contends the trial court erred in its conclusion that the statements of the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the first two requirements have been satisfied in this case, and that the sole remaining issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361850 - 2021-04-29
that the first two requirements have been satisfied in this case, and that the sole remaining issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361850 - 2021-04-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“CHIPS” cases). Following their removal, the children remained continuously placed outside C.J.’s home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241760 - 2019-06-04
“CHIPS” cases). Following their removal, the children remained continuously placed outside C.J.’s home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241760 - 2019-06-04