Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 65287 for divorce records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
an oral decision denying McKenzie’s motion for sentence modification, which was recorded in a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120440 - 2015-04-21

COURT OF APPEALS
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54716 - 2010-09-22

[PDF] State v. Michael Adam Watts
as a principal or direct actor. ¶3 The record indicates that at the close of the evidence, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2182 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Waukesha County Department of Health and Human Services v. Teresa L.B.
Richards v. Mendivil, 200 Wis. 2d 665, 671, 548 N.W.2d 85 (Ct. App. 1996). Thus, if the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16140 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John A. Nutt
and Inspection requesting, among other things, that the State provide “[a]ny relevant written or recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] John A. Zulliger v. Town of Harding
of record of lands through which the highway may pass or, if the application is for discontinuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2482 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Dale G. Latus v. James Johnson
be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12395 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54716 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270724 - 2020-07-22

[PDF] State v. James C. Koepp
some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence. Jung v. State, 32 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11833 - 2017-09-21