Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 50555 for our.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 50555 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
findings are clearly erroneous. Our review of the recording also confirms those findings. ¶3 Wall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89394 - 2012-11-19
findings are clearly erroneous. Our review of the recording also confirms those findings. ¶3 Wall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89394 - 2012-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision to deny Shields’ petition for conditional release. Our independent review of the Record does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770136 - 2024-02-28
decision to deny Shields’ petition for conditional release. Our independent review of the Record does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770136 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the consecutive sentences imposed by the court were unduly harsh.1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1107279 - 2026-04-21
that the consecutive sentences imposed by the court were unduly harsh.1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1107279 - 2026-04-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117081 - 2017-09-21
our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117081 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of merit exists with regard to the length of the sentences. Our review of the record discloses no other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91451 - 2013-01-15
of merit exists with regard to the length of the sentences. Our review of the record discloses no other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91451 - 2013-01-15
State v. Michael Gary Locke
at the recommendation of the district attorney and arresting officer. Upon review, our supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8495 - 2005-03-31
at the recommendation of the district attorney and arresting officer. Upon review, our supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8495 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court erroneously exercised its discretion when it dismissed the suit with prejudice. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82382 - 2012-05-14
court erroneously exercised its discretion when it dismissed the suit with prejudice. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82382 - 2012-05-14
State v. Larry R. Holmon
of the procedure used by the police. See Kaelin, 196 Wis. 2d at 13. In light of our conclusion that the show up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2762 - 2005-03-31
of the procedure used by the police. See Kaelin, 196 Wis. 2d at 13. In light of our conclusion that the show up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2762 - 2005-03-31
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
Lindell first argues, as above, that the decision makers were biased. Our analysis above also applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6556 - 2005-03-31
Lindell first argues, as above, that the decision makers were biased. Our analysis above also applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6556 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alberta P. Lessard
. ¶6 Our standard of review from the trial court’s findings of fact is quite limited: we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3062 - 2005-03-31
. ¶6 Our standard of review from the trial court’s findings of fact is quite limited: we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3062 - 2005-03-31