Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 30311 - 30320 of 58500 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
, strangulation, and intimidation of a victim, following a jury trial. Brown contends that the State violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92258 - 2013-01-30
, strangulation, and intimidation of a victim, following a jury trial. Brown contends that the State violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92258 - 2013-01-30
William Nix v. Floyd Powell, Jr.
. Exercising its equity powers under Wis. Stat. § 706.04, the trial court enforced the agreement by compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2785 - 2005-03-31
. Exercising its equity powers under Wis. Stat. § 706.04, the trial court enforced the agreement by compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2785 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
concurrent with the revocation sentence Beard was then serving. Beard asserts that the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92708 - 2013-02-12
concurrent with the revocation sentence Beard was then serving. Beard asserts that the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92708 - 2013-02-12
David C. Zugenbuehler v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that there was a legitimate doubt as to how his injury was sustained. On appeal, the trial court reversed, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8581 - 2005-03-31
that there was a legitimate doubt as to how his injury was sustained. On appeal, the trial court reversed, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there is no arguable issue with regard to the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion because it never
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104491 - 2017-09-21
there is no arguable issue with regard to the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion because it never
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104491 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher E. Maas
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[1] The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4887 - 2005-03-31
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[1] The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4887 - 2005-03-31
Steven W. Gradeless v. Beverly Gradeless
affirm the trial court’s determination that the doctrine of estoppel bars Steven from raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6712 - 2005-03-31
affirm the trial court’s determination that the doctrine of estoppel bars Steven from raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6712 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Edward Pryzina v. City of Thorp
within inches of his lot line. Pryzina contends that: the trial court should have taken additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10079 - 2017-09-19
within inches of his lot line. Pryzina contends that: the trial court should have taken additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10079 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21. Hampton was convicted following a jury trial of possession of a firearm by a felon and first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197808 - 2017-10-18
809.21. Hampton was convicted following a jury trial of possession of a firearm by a felon and first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197808 - 2017-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Winkler
an officer. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15277 - 2017-09-21
an officer. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15277 - 2017-09-21