Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30321 - 30330 of 62001 for child support.
Search results 30321 - 30330 of 62001 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
because the evidence supports application of the doctrine of inevitable discovery. Under that doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37636 - 2009-07-13
because the evidence supports application of the doctrine of inevitable discovery. Under that doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37636 - 2009-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the No. 2023AP2376-CR 2 evidence at trial is sufficient to support Goetzen’s convictions. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978569 - 2025-07-03
the No. 2023AP2376-CR 2 evidence at trial is sufficient to support Goetzen’s convictions. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978569 - 2025-07-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-FT 2 that the investigative stop of his vehicle was not supported by reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86101 - 2014-09-15
-FT 2 that the investigative stop of his vehicle was not supported by reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86101 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a witness in the underlying drug trafficking case. The motion was supported by an affidavit summarizing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
a witness in the underlying drug trafficking case. The motion was supported by an affidavit summarizing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We disagree and affirm the judgment. ¶2 On June 28, 2008, State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46582 - 2014-09-15
was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We disagree and affirm the judgment. ¶2 On June 28, 2008, State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46582 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2012AP83 2 809.19(1)(d),2 we rely largely on Great American’s brief, as supported by the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97925 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP83 2 809.19(1)(d),2 we rely largely on Great American’s brief, as supported by the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97925 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Support Program, and that “[F.E.K.] could see that those are things that would be helpful, but he didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2010-01-04
Support Program, and that “[F.E.K.] could see that those are things that would be helpful, but he didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2010-01-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is arguing that the Stranskys failed to present evidence supporting an inference that connects Rockweiler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162584 - 2017-09-21
is arguing that the Stranskys failed to present evidence supporting an inference that connects Rockweiler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162584 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Regardless, my analysis below supports the conclusion that no reasonable fact finder could conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115994 - 2017-09-21
. Regardless, my analysis below supports the conclusion that no reasonable fact finder could conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to support that Mr. Hull was under the influence of any intoxicants when doing so.” ¶16 In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027815 - 2025-10-23
to support that Mr. Hull was under the influence of any intoxicants when doing so.” ¶16 In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027815 - 2025-10-23