Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30331 - 30340 of 38190 for ph d.
Search results 30331 - 30340 of 38190 for ph d.
[PDF]
State v. Shawn Virlee
reject Virlee’s equal protection argument. No. 02-0046 6 D. Pretrial confinement ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4807 - 2017-09-20
reject Virlee’s equal protection argument. No. 02-0046 6 D. Pretrial confinement ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4807 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d) requires an appellant to include in a principal brief a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97503 - 2014-09-15
that WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d) requires an appellant to include in a principal brief a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the information [he] had” he “believe[d] [Smithers] was taking her medication as prescribed.” Referencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234159 - 2019-02-06
on the information [he] had” he “believe[d] [Smithers] was taking her medication as prescribed.” Referencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234159 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from orders of the circuit court for Washburn County: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75140 - 2014-09-15
from orders of the circuit court for Washburn County: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75140 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. JOHN D. ARTHUR GRIFFIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENT, V. JOHN D. ARTHUR GRIFFIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 Doege’s appellate brief asserts that he is no longer pursuing this claim “[d]ue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
. 2 Doege’s appellate brief asserts that he is no longer pursuing this claim “[d]ue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Jonathan D. Watts Circuit Court Judge, Br. 15 Safety Building 821 W State St Milwaukee, WI 53233
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181359 - 2017-09-21
. Jonathan D. Watts Circuit Court Judge, Br. 15 Safety Building 821 W State St Milwaukee, WI 53233
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181359 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or not he wanted to testify. … [D]id I specifically talk with him about the nature and effect of the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
or not he wanted to testify. … [D]id I specifically talk with him about the nature and effect of the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
should take jurisdiction. See RULE 809.51(1)(a)-(d); Smalley, 211 Wis. 2d 795 & n.7. The statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21
should take jurisdiction. See RULE 809.51(1)(a)-(d); Smalley, 211 Wis. 2d 795 & n.7. The statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the record, and he alleged that the “judge was prejudice[d]” and “bias[ed].” Although we did not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
on the record, and he alleged that the “judge was prejudice[d]” and “bias[ed].” Although we did not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11