Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30341 - 30350 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 30341 - 30350 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. James J. Wardell
effective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that he did and therefore affirm. NO. 96-0999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10653 - 2017-09-20
effective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that he did and therefore affirm. NO. 96-0999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10653 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
At the August 14, 2007 trial, Shope testified he observed skid marks on Highway 51, stating: The skid marks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32625 - 2008-05-05
At the August 14, 2007 trial, Shope testified he observed skid marks on Highway 51, stating: The skid marks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32625 - 2008-05-05
[PDF]
State v. James D. Miller
interrogation should have been admitted, and whether he was entitled to a new trial because the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3137 - 2017-09-19
interrogation should have been admitted, and whether he was entitled to a new trial because the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3137 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Sheila L. Davis v. Carey K. Davis
interest, No. 00-1271 2 is $15,400. The trial court, however, determined that $15,400 excludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2589 - 2017-09-19
interest, No. 00-1271 2 is $15,400. The trial court, however, determined that $15,400 excludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2589 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tony L. Sutton
) § 951.095 is unconstitutionally vague and (2) the trial court considered an improper factor at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11486 - 2005-03-31
) § 951.095 is unconstitutionally vague and (2) the trial court considered an improper factor at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11486 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, strangulation, and intimidation of a victim, following a jury trial. Brown contends that the State violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92258 - 2013-01-30
, strangulation, and intimidation of a victim, following a jury trial. Brown contends that the State violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92258 - 2013-01-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury to disregard spontaneous and unresponsive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53128 - 2014-09-15
argues the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury to disregard spontaneous and unresponsive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Steven W. Gradeless v. Beverly Gradeless
discussed below, we affirm the trial court’s determination that the doctrine of estoppel bars Steven from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6712 - 2017-09-20
discussed below, we affirm the trial court’s determination that the doctrine of estoppel bars Steven from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6712 - 2017-09-20
William Nix v. Floyd Powell, Jr.
. Exercising its equity powers under Wis. Stat. § 706.04, the trial court enforced the agreement by compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2785 - 2005-03-31
. Exercising its equity powers under Wis. Stat. § 706.04, the trial court enforced the agreement by compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Teresa L. v. Sauk County
(1964), the circuit court held that the following five criteria determine whether to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8100 - 2017-09-19
(1964), the circuit court held that the following five criteria determine whether to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8100 - 2017-09-19