Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30351 - 30360 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30351 - 30360 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 25, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30353 - 2007-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 25, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30353 - 2007-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
much explanation is necessary, of course, will vary from case to case.” Id. The court went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32893 - 2008-06-02
much explanation is necessary, of course, will vary from case to case.” Id. The court went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32893 - 2008-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. Schumacher, 144 Wis. 2d 388, 409, 424 N.W.2d 672 (1988). ¶5 In this case, however, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33801 - 2008-08-20
. Schumacher, 144 Wis. 2d 388, 409, 424 N.W.2d 672 (1988). ¶5 In this case, however, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33801 - 2008-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
had the case, as Judge Howard had retired. Cohan Lipp asked the court to revisit the “shared risk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123492 - 2014-10-14
had the case, as Judge Howard had retired. Cohan Lipp asked the court to revisit the “shared risk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123492 - 2014-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44278 - 2009-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44278 - 2009-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
again in Huber v. Stark, 124 Wis. 359, 365, 102 N.W. 12 (1905). In that case, the court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79822 - 2012-03-26
again in Huber v. Stark, 124 Wis. 359, 365, 102 N.W. 12 (1905). In that case, the court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79822 - 2012-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
relief.” The court explained: By entering no contest pleas in this case, the defendant waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02
relief.” The court explained: By entering no contest pleas in this case, the defendant waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS
). But that case applies to penalty enhancers: in Apprendi, the Court dealt with a hate crime enhancer extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33924 - 2008-09-02
). But that case applies to penalty enhancers: in Apprendi, the Court dealt with a hate crime enhancer extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33924 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. Trial courts decide the reasonableness of the officer’s suspicion on a “case-by-case basis.” See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32070 - 2008-03-11
. Trial courts decide the reasonableness of the officer’s suspicion on a “case-by-case basis.” See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32070 - 2008-03-11