Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30351 - 30360 of 61720 for does.
Search results 30351 - 30360 of 61720 for does.
[PDF]
State v. Otis J. Braxton
(1996). The State does not dispute that Braxton timely requested a self- No(s). 99-0801-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15302 - 2017-09-21
(1996). The State does not dispute that Braxton timely requested a self- No(s). 99-0801-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15302 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in her sentencing arguments: “Page 4 of the PSI says he does not recall the oral sex with her, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515422 - 2022-05-04
in her sentencing arguments: “Page 4 of the PSI says he does not recall the oral sex with her, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515422 - 2022-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or on the plea questionnaire. 2 Counsel then informed us that Brown does not wish to pursue this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232924 - 2019-01-15
or on the plea questionnaire. 2 Counsel then informed us that Brown does not wish to pursue this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232924 - 2019-01-15
[PDF]
State v. Hung Nam Tran
by WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(c), the defendant is entitled to withdraw the plea if the State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15915 - 2017-09-21
by WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(c), the defendant is entitled to withdraw the plea if the State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15915 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, 618 N.W.2d 528. Because Roehl does not allege that he was denied counsel in his previous OWI case, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58419 - 2011-01-03
, 618 N.W.2d 528. Because Roehl does not allege that he was denied counsel in his previous OWI case, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58419 - 2011-01-03
State v. Elizabeth A. Quinlan
. Elizabeth does not assert that Krueger would have testified differently. ¶11 At the Machner hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19316 - 2005-08-16
. Elizabeth does not assert that Krueger would have testified differently. ¶11 At the Machner hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19316 - 2005-08-16
State v. Anthony D. Williams
information from that proceeding. Further, the sentencing transcript in the instant case does reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10284 - 2005-03-31
information from that proceeding. Further, the sentencing transcript in the instant case does reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10284 - 2005-03-31
State v. Adam C.
the deficient‑performance and prejudice components if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14940 - 2005-03-31
the deficient‑performance and prejudice components if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14940 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
before being sentenced. Barnhill also argues that he does not have an “extensive” criminal record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221941 - 2018-10-17
before being sentenced. Barnhill also argues that he does not have an “extensive” criminal record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221941 - 2018-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with regard to civil cases, and does not implicate either the confrontation clause or the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15
with regard to civil cases, and does not implicate either the confrontation clause or the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15