Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30351 - 30360 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 30351 - 30360 of 58510 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court should have declared a mistrial at the beginning of the trial and during closing arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34663 - 2008-11-19
that the circuit court should have declared a mistrial at the beginning of the trial and during closing arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34663 - 2008-11-19
State v. Patricia A. Ziebell
is reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court. ¶2 The facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4241 - 2005-03-31
is reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court. ¶2 The facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
imprisonment, strangulation, and intimidation of a victim, following a jury trial. Brown contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92258 - 2014-09-15
imprisonment, strangulation, and intimidation of a victim, following a jury trial. Brown contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92258 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Armando Trevino v. Ladd & Milaeger
claims that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment dismissing his legal malpractice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3972 - 2017-09-20
claims that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment dismissing his legal malpractice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3972 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Steven W. Gradeless v. Beverly Gradeless
discussed below, we affirm the trial court’s determination that the doctrine of estoppel bars Steven from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6712 - 2017-09-20
discussed below, we affirm the trial court’s determination that the doctrine of estoppel bars Steven from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6712 - 2017-09-20
Dolores Haas v. Thomas J. Berube
misused its discretion by failing to grant her Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(b) motion for a new trial. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2262 - 2005-03-31
misused its discretion by failing to grant her Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(b) motion for a new trial. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2262 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
from Newman and from Newman’s trial attorney. Newman testified that his attorney promised him that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83766 - 2012-06-18
from Newman and from Newman’s trial attorney. Newman testified that his attorney promised him that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83766 - 2012-06-18
[PDF]
State v. William L. G.
the new statute was in effect. The trial court relied on this time line as the basis for its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4127 - 2017-09-20
the new statute was in effect. The trial court relied on this time line as the basis for its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4127 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pretrial issues; the court’s decision to strike a juror for cause during the trial; and the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041524 - 2025-11-25
pretrial issues; the court’s decision to strike a juror for cause during the trial; and the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041524 - 2025-11-25
State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
and attachments were before the trial court. Indeed, the trial court specifically referred to the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
and attachments were before the trial court. Indeed, the trial court specifically referred to the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26