Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30351 - 30360 of 58500 for speedy trial.

State v. Daniel T. Winkler
that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury on self-defense and that he is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15277 - 2005-03-31

State v. Louis H. LaCount
, the trial court stated at the time of the original sentence that it intended that LaCount make restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11225 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey H. Andrus
(Ct. App. 1989), Andrus also alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
] for DNA testing of biological material. He uses the appeal to argue for a new trial in the interests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93770 - 2013-03-04

[PDF] State v. William F. Baskin
challenges the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion. 1 We reverse. I. ¶2 At 6:00 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3992 - 2017-09-20

State v. Paul A. Balthazor
Based on the trooper’s testimony, the trial court denied Balthazor’s motion to suppress all evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6967 - 2005-03-31

John F. Maloney v. Port Superior Marina Association Board of Directors
. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The court concluded that the members
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13419 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
presided over the jury trial and sentencing in this matter. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908247 - 2025-02-04

State v. Mark Drew
, that a new trial is required in the interest of justice, and that the court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10672 - 2005-03-31

Otto Mogged v. Margaret A. Mogged
denying his motion to modify his maintenance obligation. He argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6428 - 2005-03-31