Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30361 - 30370 of 61886 for does.
Search results 30361 - 30370 of 61886 for does.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forth in WIS. STAT. § 973.19 and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 have expired. Further, Hayslett does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015544 - 2025-09-30
forth in WIS. STAT. § 973.19 and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 have expired. Further, Hayslett does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015544 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Hung Nam Tran
by WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(c), the defendant is entitled to withdraw the plea if the State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15915 - 2017-09-21
by WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(c), the defendant is entitled to withdraw the plea if the State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15915 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Johnson
for the increased penalty at resentencing. Double jeopardy does not apply where a correction to an original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8844 - 2017-09-19
for the increased penalty at resentencing. Double jeopardy does not apply where a correction to an original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8844 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Hirthe
) and 343.305. Paragraphs (a) and (b) each require proof of a fact for conviction which the other does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8925 - 2017-09-19
) and 343.305. Paragraphs (a) and (b) each require proof of a fact for conviction which the other does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8925 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
before being sentenced. Barnhill also argues that he does not have an “extensive” criminal record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221941 - 2018-10-17
before being sentenced. Barnhill also argues that he does not have an “extensive” criminal record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221941 - 2018-10-17
[PDF]
James Freer v. Zimbrick, Inc.
a trial court be “estopped” from rejecting a party’s proposal in a letter simply because the court does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12914 - 2017-09-21
a trial court be “estopped” from rejecting a party’s proposal in a letter simply because the court does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12914 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
they were reimposed. ¶7 Fondren claims that Escalona does not procedurally bar sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29346 - 2007-06-11
they were reimposed. ¶7 Fondren claims that Escalona does not procedurally bar sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29346 - 2007-06-11
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Marion L. M.
the B.L.J. decision requires. But this does not necessarily mean, however, that we must reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4302 - 2005-03-31
the B.L.J. decision requires. But this does not necessarily mean, however, that we must reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Helen J. Lecker
element that the other does not. See id. at 493-94 n.8. Applying that test to the offenses involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16327 - 2017-09-21
element that the other does not. See id. at 493-94 n.8. Applying that test to the offenses involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16327 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of West Allis v. Robert C. Braun
). No. 03-3315 5 (1m) Whoever does any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7127 - 2017-09-20
). No. 03-3315 5 (1m) Whoever does any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7127 - 2017-09-20