Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30371 - 30380 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 30371 - 30380 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Chestnut’s claims could not be addressed in a § 974.06 motion because he was not challenging his underlying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346078 - 2021-03-16
that Chestnut’s claims could not be addressed in a § 974.06 motion because he was not challenging his underlying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346078 - 2021-03-16
COURT OF APPEALS
felonies and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He claims: (1) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94664 - 2013-03-27
felonies and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He claims: (1) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94664 - 2013-03-27
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
agent. Clara M. Rolland claims that she was injured when she was a passenger on one of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
agent. Clara M. Rolland claims that she was injured when she was a passenger on one of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
was insufficient to convict him of misdemeanor theft. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to convict him of misdemeanor theft. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James H. Dumke
to the circuit court for a hearing on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel against Attorney Dumke
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16509 - 2005-03-31
to the circuit court for a hearing on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel against Attorney Dumke
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16509 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cynthia S.
for termination of parental rights. She claims, therefore, that she is entitled to withdraw her plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
for termination of parental rights. She claims, therefore, that she is entitled to withdraw her plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Peggy Sue Podolak v. John Peter Podolak
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Peggy first claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6283 - 2017-09-19
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Peggy first claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6283 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a restitution hearing. Jackson claimed his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446258 - 2021-10-27
for a restitution hearing. Jackson claimed his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446258 - 2021-10-27
Crystal R. Steinhart v. St. Paul Fire & Casualty Insurance
. Specifically, the Steinharts claim that: (1) one of the defense expert witnesses should not have been permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11427 - 2005-03-31
. Specifically, the Steinharts claim that: (1) one of the defense expert witnesses should not have been permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11427 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jamal D. Jones
raised below preserves the Riverside claim. Finally, Jones argues that the trial court violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9217 - 2017-09-19
raised below preserves the Riverside claim. Finally, Jones argues that the trial court violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9217 - 2017-09-19