Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30371 - 30380 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30371 - 30380 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 20, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72493 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 20, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72493 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34875 - 2008-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34875 - 2008-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court “failed to address the facts that are prominent in this case.” We disagree. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04
that the circuit court “failed to address the facts that are prominent in this case.” We disagree. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances surrounding the tip. Id., ¶18. ¶10 The Rutzinski court distinguished Rutzinski’s case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29452 - 2007-06-20
of the circumstances surrounding the tip. Id., ¶18. ¶10 The Rutzinski court distinguished Rutzinski’s case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29452 - 2007-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
agree. We also observe that the court instructed the jury that it was to decide the case solely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97025 - 2013-05-21
agree. We also observe that the court instructed the jury that it was to decide the case solely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97025 - 2013-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 9, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65493 - 2011-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 9, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65493 - 2011-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. In that case, our supreme court held that, as a general matter, the time it takes an officer to ask a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61685 - 2011-03-23
. In that case, our supreme court held that, as a general matter, the time it takes an officer to ask a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61685 - 2011-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 8, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116147 - 2014-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 8, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116147 - 2014-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court. We need not resolve the cross-appeal because we decide this case in Adams’ favor based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51804 - 2010-07-07
by the circuit court. We need not resolve the cross-appeal because we decide this case in Adams’ favor based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51804 - 2010-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
but it was not an unreasonable intrusion. The court reasoned that “this is a case where if Mr. Hoard did not live within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31015 - 2007-11-28
but it was not an unreasonable intrusion. The court reasoned that “this is a case where if Mr. Hoard did not live within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31015 - 2007-11-28