Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30381 - 30390 of 62000 for child support.
Search results 30381 - 30390 of 62000 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion supported by articulable facts 2 The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140075 - 2017-09-21
suspicion supported by articulable facts 2 The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the facts of his case did not support imposition of the DNA surcharge, where no DNA had been collected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58298 - 2014-09-15
that the facts of his case did not support imposition of the DNA surcharge, where no DNA had been collected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58298 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreement in its initial sentencing argument. Stephens cites no support for his proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15
agreement in its initial sentencing argument. Stephens cites no support for his proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s finding that Tyler is a sexually violent person, (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148976 - 2017-09-21
the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s finding that Tyler is a sexually violent person, (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148976 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of mental disease or defect. After a court- ordered psychological evaluation did not support the NGI pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102167 - 2017-09-21
of mental disease or defect. After a court- ordered psychological evaluation did not support the NGI pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102167 - 2017-09-21
Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
. The trial court found Mary Jane’s testimony incredible and the record supports that finding. Because her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court found Mary Jane’s testimony incredible and the record supports that finding. Because her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the search incident to arrest, which he explained supported his belief that Rodriguez had consumed alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837457 - 2024-08-14
the search incident to arrest, which he explained supported his belief that Rodriguez had consumed alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837457 - 2024-08-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeal, Eckstein challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions and, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59313 - 2014-09-15
appeal, Eckstein challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions and, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59313 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had been ineffective for failing to present that evidence. In support of these claims, Seals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168437 - 2017-09-21
had been ineffective for failing to present that evidence. In support of these claims, Seals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168437 - 2017-09-21
Gwendolyn K. Jeffro v. Hormel Foods Corporation
or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13249 - 2005-03-31
or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13249 - 2005-03-31