Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30381 - 30390 of 43284 for legal seperation.
Search results 30381 - 30390 of 43284 for legal seperation.
State v. Anthony Harris
of whether the investigatory stop of the van was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31
of whether the investigatory stop of the van was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
after an evidentiary hearing, and Ellis does not revisit this ruling on appeal. [4] The legal effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88999 - 2012-11-05
after an evidentiary hearing, and Ellis does not revisit this ruling on appeal. [4] The legal effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88999 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶11 Morocco argues that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard and inaccurately recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006351 - 2025-09-09
. ¶11 Morocco argues that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard and inaccurately recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006351 - 2025-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
it with legal authority to require the narratives to be submitted for an in camera inspection. Defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
it with legal authority to require the narratives to be submitted for an in camera inspection. Defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
State v. Robert A. Huppeler
the facts, applied the proper legal standard, and used a demonstrated rational process to reach a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14235 - 2005-03-31
the facts, applied the proper legal standard, and used a demonstrated rational process to reach a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14235 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court by the clearly erroneous standard but independently address the legal constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28813 - 2007-06-26
of the trial court by the clearly erroneous standard but independently address the legal constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28813 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31968 - 2008-02-27
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31968 - 2008-02-27
State v. Lee A. Brown
, see id., and the questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10525 - 2005-03-31
, see id., and the questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10525 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark J. Zimmerman
, this case presents a clash between two legal principles. On one hand, when, as here, a defendant is charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6158 - 2005-03-31
, this case presents a clash between two legal principles. On one hand, when, as here, a defendant is charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and establish whether the suspect’s activity is legal or illegal.... We conclude that if any reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66557 - 2014-09-15
and establish whether the suspect’s activity is legal or illegal.... We conclude that if any reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66557 - 2014-09-15