Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30391 - 30400 of 91554 for 1.
Search results 30391 - 30400 of 91554 for 1.
CA Blank Order
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12).[1] Counsel provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108198 - 2014-02-16
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12).[1] Counsel provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108198 - 2014-02-16
State v. Kenneth A. Roberts
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15931 - 2005-03-31
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15931 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. The appellant’s brief raises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95126 - 2013-04-03
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. The appellant’s brief raises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95126 - 2013-04-03
COURT OF APPEALS
: KELLY J. THIMM, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Cathy Ann Currie appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68245 - 2011-07-18
: KELLY J. THIMM, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Cathy Ann Currie appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68245 - 2011-07-18
[PDF]
State v. Eugene C. Lee
Roggensack, Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eugene Lee appeals a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3081 - 2017-09-20
Roggensack, Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eugene Lee appeals a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3081 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
and to explain why the same change is not proposed for Wis. Stat. § 906.09(1). The court asked the Judicial
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182807 - 2017-09-21
and to explain why the same change is not proposed for Wis. Stat. § 906.09(1). The court asked the Judicial
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chester Lee Hill
., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Chester Lee Hill appeals pro se from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7303 - 2017-09-20
., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Chester Lee Hill appeals pro se from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7303 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. Storck, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29369 - 2007-06-13
. Storck, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29369 - 2007-06-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Karls appeals from an order denying a postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27227 - 2014-09-15
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Karls appeals from an order denying a postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27227 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andrew J. Zastrow
: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. DYKMAN, P.J.1 Andrew Zastrow appeals from an order revoking his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13388 - 2017-09-21
: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. DYKMAN, P.J.1 Andrew Zastrow appeals from an order revoking his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13388 - 2017-09-21