Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 29985 for de.

[PDF] Mark Anderson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. of De Pere. 2002 WI App 315 NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5144 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
requested a trial de novo pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). Following a two-day trial de novo, the Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239681 - 2019-04-25

[PDF] Anna M. Rasmussen v. Larry D. Rasmussen
to seek work on the alternate weekends when the children were with Larry. Both parties sought de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11540 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
-RESPONDENT, V. DE-YUL THAMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments and orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34788 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Laona State Bank v. State
is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13053 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Fontaine Baker
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4253 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 127
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101998 - 2017-09-21

Diamondback Funding, LLC v. Chili's of Wisconsin, Inc.
of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6845 - 2005-03-31

court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion ...
judgment, we apply the same methodology as the circuit court and review de novo the grant or denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89924 - 2013-01-29

State v. Dennis J. King
de novo. See Bank of Barron v. Gieseke, 169 Wis.2d 437, 454-55, 485 N.W.2d 426, 432 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11467 - 2005-03-31