Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 29712 for des.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
Jeffrey Allen v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
conducts a de novo review of the board’s decision. See Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. of Adjustment, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
conducts a de novo review of the board’s decision. See Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. of Adjustment, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Laona State Bank v. State
is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13053 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Bender, 213 Wis.2d 338, 341, 570 N.W.2d 590, 592
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13053 - 2017-09-21
Milwaukee County v. Juneau County
coverage. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5821 - 2005-03-31
coverage. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5821 - 2005-03-31
State v. Davon R. Malcom
the proper legal standard is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Finally, the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3646 - 2005-03-31
the proper legal standard is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Finally, the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3646 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, v. De-Yul Thames, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
, v. De-Yul Thames, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
Reply Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Citizen Mathematicians)
and RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, LEAGUE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrctocitizenmath.pdf - 2022-01-04
and RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, LEAGUE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrctocitizenmath.pdf - 2022-01-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963128 - 2025-06-03
of law that we review de novo. State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963128 - 2025-06-03
Norman S. De Ruyter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Title of Case: †Petition for review filed Norman S. De Ruyter, Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6923 - 2005-03-31
Title of Case: †Petition for review filed Norman S. De Ruyter, Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6923 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The Kraemer Company, LLC v. Sauk County Board of Adjustment
; and (3) de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57 (1996). Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3056 - 2017-09-19
; and (3) de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57 (1996). Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3056 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court held a Machner 3 hearing, at which Jones, his trial counsel, a De Marco As-Saffat, and a Cedric
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195018 - 2017-09-21
. The court held a Machner 3 hearing, at which Jones, his trial counsel, a De Marco As-Saffat, and a Cedric
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195018 - 2017-09-21