Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 45831 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] NOTICE
the jury the poll’s purpose was to check in case “the wrong piece of paper was signed,” then asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29239 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
counter, put down a piece of paper, and said: “This is a robbery, bitch, give me the money, I have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235461 - 2019-02-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
,” and that “test is met if the defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel.”) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164274 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
that de novo review of a paper record is proper only when the underlying questions involve issues of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27980 - 2007-01-30

State v. Jonathan C. Segner
). If Segner fails to satisfy one element of the Strickland test, we need not address the other. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15355 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
license. Greenberg also confirmed that after he stopped Ch-ab’s vehicle, he noticed a “piece of paper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776173 - 2024-03-20

State v. Daniel H. Stormer
: (d) Convictions under the law of another jurisdiction that prohibits refusal of chemical testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3376 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
not occurred.” McCrossen v. Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co., 59 Wis.2d 245, 264, 208 N.W.2d 148, 159 (1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12169 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles L. Davies
). An allegation of bias by a defendant must be reviewed under both a subjective and objective test. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16334 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marjorie M. Veeser
that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5194 - 2005-03-31