Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 12952 for prosecuting.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 12952 for prosecuting.
State v. Barbara E. Harp
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20087 - 2005-12-11
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20087 - 2005-12-11
State v. Elbert Whitelaw
1 and November 2, 1993. The prosecution stated that it intended to prove finger/vaginal intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31
1 and November 2, 1993. The prosecution stated that it intended to prove finger/vaginal intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of that statute must be prosecuted before the victim reaches the age of twenty-six years. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
of that statute must be prosecuted before the victim reaches the age of twenty-six years. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
“that the prosecution be prohibited from any use or reference to any recorded statements made by the defendant, or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32972 - 2014-09-15
“that the prosecution be prohibited from any use or reference to any recorded statements made by the defendant, or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32972 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Barbara E. Harp
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20087 - 2017-09-21
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20087 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for exercising his First Amendment rights, which appears to be a retaliatory prosecution claim. In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
for exercising his First Amendment rights, which appears to be a retaliatory prosecution claim. In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
State v. Roger L. Warren
under § 946.31(1)(c), Stats., be brought as a single count or as a single "unit of prosecution." See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
under § 946.31(1)(c), Stats., be brought as a single count or as a single "unit of prosecution." See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
version of the same. Second, Wright’s pre-trial motion in limine only requested “that the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32972 - 2008-06-09
version of the same. Second, Wright’s pre-trial motion in limine only requested “that the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32972 - 2008-06-09
State v. Tony M. Smith
court's sentencing decision, but whether the prosecution complied with the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8415 - 2005-03-31
court's sentencing decision, but whether the prosecution complied with the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Martin T. Holtet
prosecution and that the real controversy was not fully tried. No. 94-2322-CR -2- We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8073 - 2017-09-19
prosecution and that the real controversy was not fully tried. No. 94-2322-CR -2- We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8073 - 2017-09-19