Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Barbara E. Harp
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20087 - 2005-12-11
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20087 - 2005-12-11
State v. Roger L. Warren
under § 946.31(1)(c), Stats., be brought as a single count or as a single "unit of prosecution." See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
under § 946.31(1)(c), Stats., be brought as a single count or as a single "unit of prosecution." See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene P. Opalewski
was not prosecuted but, in the latter, he was prosecuted, was convicted, and served a prison term. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
was not prosecuted but, in the latter, he was prosecuted, was convicted, and served a prison term. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
represented that her agreement not to prosecute was approved by the investigating agency in Iron Mountain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208408 - 2018-02-13
represented that her agreement not to prosecute was approved by the investigating agency in Iron Mountain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208408 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Barbara E. Harp
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20087 - 2017-09-21
on September 23, 2004. The prosecution called Kleist, who testified that on May 16, 2003, Harp worked as her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20087 - 2017-09-21
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
States Constitution, in pertinent part, provides that: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17436 - 2005-03-31
States Constitution, in pertinent part, provides that: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Zanelli
through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13743 - 2014-09-15
through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13743 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 27
could be prosecuted under the statute, but a defendant who arguably engages in more blameworthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15
could be prosecuted under the statute, but a defendant who arguably engages in more blameworthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15
State v. James R. Thiel
not seek a continuance of the trial date. ¶7 At trial, the prosecution relied on (1) JoAnn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4071 - 2005-03-31
not seek a continuance of the trial date. ¶7 At trial, the prosecution relied on (1) JoAnn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4071 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecution during the trial to call attention to [the defendant’s] silence at the time of arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466413 - 2021-12-27
the prosecution during the trial to call attention to [the defendant’s] silence at the time of arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466413 - 2021-12-27