Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 12891 for prosecuting.

[PDF] State v. James R. Thiel
At trial, the prosecution relied on (1) JoAnn’s version of her sexual encounters with Thiel; (2) her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4071 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Scott L. Stevenson
that the statute was both vague for failing to clearly define the unit of prosecution under the statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17415 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] George M.S. v. Heidi Hida
will be arrested if he comes to Wisconsin; (4) had been threatened with prosecution by Ethel’s representatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20807 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 27
could be prosecuted under the statute, but a defendant who arguably engages in more blameworthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the following bases for granting him a new trial: (1) the State failed to fully disclose its prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
imprisonment; and (4) malicious prosecution. Each of his claims arose out of his No. 2015AP618 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170310 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to these studies, the 2017 motion asserts that medical testimony elicited by the prosecution at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761189 - 2024-02-08

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
though Taliento had testified he believed he could still be prosecuted. Id. at 152. The Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28312 - 2007-03-05

State v. James R. Thiel
not seek a continuance of the trial date. ¶7 At trial, the prosecution relied on (1) JoAnn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4071 - 2005-03-31

George M.S. v. Heidi Hida
threatened with prosecution by Ethel’s representatives; and (5) would therefore “not appear at any deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20807 - 2005-12-27