Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 76985 for search which.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 76985 for search which.
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Mary Nell Matzdorf
” No. 97-2072 10 function which may justify certain police actions, such as a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12760 - 2017-09-21
” No. 97-2072 10 function which may justify certain police actions, such as a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12760 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion to conduct the search. After a hearing on the motion, at which one of the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504233 - 2022-04-05
reasonable suspicion to conduct the search. After a hearing on the motion, at which one of the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504233 - 2022-04-05
State v. Sean Smith
of a subsequent search should have been suppressed. We agree and reverse. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11973 - 2005-03-31
of a subsequent search should have been suppressed. We agree and reverse. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11973 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sean Smith
and that evidence obtained as a result of a subsequent search should have been suppressed. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11973 - 2017-09-21
and that evidence obtained as a result of a subsequent search should have been suppressed. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stanley R. Scott
subsequent warrantless search of his person violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11689 - 2017-09-20
subsequent warrantless search of his person violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11689 - 2017-09-20
State v. Stanley R. Scott
not have probable cause to do so, and therefore the officer’s subsequent warrantless search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11689 - 2005-03-31
not have probable cause to do so, and therefore the officer’s subsequent warrantless search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11689 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which occurred on January 11, 2011, the confidential informant went to Jones’s home and then traveled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
, which occurred on January 11, 2011, the confidential informant went to Jones’s home and then traveled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. For the second purchase, which occurred on January 11, 2011, the confidential informant went to Jones’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
. For the second purchase, which occurred on January 11, 2011, the confidential informant went to Jones’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Amendment permits warrantless searches "within 'the area into which an arrestee might reach in order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210924 - 2018-06-08
Amendment permits warrantless searches "within 'the area into which an arrestee might reach in order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210924 - 2018-06-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
introduced Hensley’s notebook, which contained Lungren’s signed consent for officers to search both his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139735 - 2017-09-21
introduced Hensley’s notebook, which contained Lungren’s signed consent for officers to search both his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139735 - 2017-09-21