Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 83862 for simple case search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 83862 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 3.2(d), at 58–59 & nn.134–35 (4th ed. 2004) (collecting cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250171 - 2019-11-15
Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 3.2(d), at 58–59 & nn.134–35 (4th ed. 2004) (collecting cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250171 - 2019-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was illegally seized when he consented to a search of his vehicle; and (2) even if Hogan was not seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112449 - 2014-05-14
was illegally seized when he consented to a search of his vehicle; and (2) even if Hogan was not seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112449 - 2014-05-14
[PDF]
State v. Wallace Vincent McClain
vehicle was stopped for committing a lane deviation violation, police officers searched the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12745 - 2017-09-21
vehicle was stopped for committing a lane deviation violation, police officers searched the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12745 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wallace Vincent McClain
for committing a lane deviation violation, police officers searched the car, forcibly opened a locked console
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12745 - 2005-03-31
for committing a lane deviation violation, police officers searched the car, forcibly opened a locked console
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12745 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
search warrants were not supported by probable cause. We reject Sedlak’s narrow argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172913 - 2017-09-21
search warrants were not supported by probable cause. We reject Sedlak’s narrow argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172913 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 152
that Romero should not control because it was a No. 2010AP2553-CR 10 search warrant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72012 - 2014-09-15
that Romero should not control because it was a No. 2010AP2553-CR 10 search warrant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72012 - 2014-09-15
WI App 152 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2553-CR Complete Titl...
to obtain a search warrant, controls the instant case. ¶17 In Romero, a confidential informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72012 - 2011-01-18
to obtain a search warrant, controls the instant case. ¶17 In Romero, a confidential informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72012 - 2011-01-18
Frontsheet
that the cases addressing dog sniffs in other circumstances established that dog sniffs were not searches
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136547 - 2015-03-04
that the cases addressing dog sniffs in other circumstances established that dog sniffs were not searches
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136547 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. 2d 206. In that case a court commissioner issued a no-knock search warrant based on an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136547 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 206. In that case a court commissioner issued a no-knock search warrant based on an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136547 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
were entitled to detain King "while a proper search [was] conducted." 452 U.S. at 705. In King's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10730 - 2005-03-31
were entitled to detain King "while a proper search [was] conducted." 452 U.S. at 705. In King's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10730 - 2005-03-31