Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 22932 for warrants/1000.
Search results 3041 - 3050 of 22932 for warrants/1000.
State v. David Z. Williams
on October 1, and his probation agent issued a probation apprehension warrant. Williams was apprehended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16052 - 2005-03-31
on October 1, and his probation agent issued a probation apprehension warrant. Williams was apprehended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William L. Tinder
of the “exigent circumstances” exception to the warrant requirement. This is because once the blood was removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3713 - 2017-09-19
of the “exigent circumstances” exception to the warrant requirement. This is because once the blood was removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3713 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel M. Andreola, Sr.
the scope of the search warrants. This argument fails because Andreola appears to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24571 - 2017-09-21
the scope of the search warrants. This argument fails because Andreola appears to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because the law does not warrant suppression based on Thompson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564853 - 2022-09-14
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because the law does not warrant suppression based on Thompson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564853 - 2022-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudicial to warrant a new trial. We therefore affirm. ¶2 The following undisputed facts are taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
prejudicial to warrant a new trial. We therefore affirm. ¶2 The following undisputed facts are taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
exception to the warrant requirement. BACKGROUND Hajicek was convicted in 1995 of possessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14870 - 2017-09-21
exception to the warrant requirement. BACKGROUND Hajicek was convicted in 1995 of possessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14870 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
within any recognized exception to the warrant requirement. BACKGROUND Hajicek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14870 - 2005-03-31
within any recognized exception to the warrant requirement. BACKGROUND Hajicek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was revoked in three criminal cases. DOC filed the revocation order and warrant in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804982 - 2024-05-23
was revoked in three criminal cases. DOC filed the revocation order and warrant in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804982 - 2024-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was revoked in three criminal cases. DOC filed the revocation order and warrant in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804982 - 2024-05-23
was revoked in three criminal cases. DOC filed the revocation order and warrant in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804982 - 2024-05-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock-and-announce” rule and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30944 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock-and-announce” rule and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30944 - 2014-09-15