Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30401 - 30410 of 91512 for 1.
Search results 30401 - 30410 of 91512 for 1.
CA Blank Order
)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rangel received a copy of the report, was advised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90936 - 2013-01-02
)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rangel received a copy of the report, was advised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90936 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857334 - 2024-10-09
report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857334 - 2024-10-09
Berrell Freeman v. Gerald Berge
Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Berrell Freeman appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6315 - 2005-03-31
Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Berrell Freeman appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6315 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2011-12).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107407 - 2014-01-23
. § 974.06 (2011-12).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107407 - 2014-01-23
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. The appellant’s brief raises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95126 - 2012-06-05
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. The appellant’s brief raises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95126 - 2012-06-05
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2009-10)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91667 - 2013-01-22
a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2009-10)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91667 - 2013-01-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
A. NOONAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Paschall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30555 - 2014-09-15
A. NOONAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Paschall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30555 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Chenere L. Bailey
and Vergeront, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Chenere Bailey appeals from a judgment of conviction. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17703 - 2017-09-21
and Vergeront, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Chenere Bailey appeals from a judgment of conviction. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17703 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: MEL FLANAGAN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 KESSLER, J.1 Joe Sanfelippo Cab, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84915 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: MEL FLANAGAN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 KESSLER, J.1 Joe Sanfelippo Cab, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84915 - 2014-09-15
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
not to accept further motions from McClellan or set court dates unless one of four conditions is met: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12370 - 2005-03-31
not to accept further motions from McClellan or set court dates unless one of four conditions is met: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12370 - 2005-03-31