Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30401 - 30410 of 38185 for ph d.
Search results 30401 - 30410 of 38185 for ph d.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from orders of the circuit court for Washburn County: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75140 - 2014-09-15
from orders of the circuit court for Washburn County: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75140 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. JOHN D. ARTHUR GRIFFIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENT, V. JOHN D. ARTHUR GRIFFIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 Doege’s appellate brief asserts that he is no longer pursuing this claim “[d]ue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
. 2 Doege’s appellate brief asserts that he is no longer pursuing this claim “[d]ue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Jonathan D. Watts Circuit Court Judge, Br. 15 Safety Building 821 W State St Milwaukee, WI 53233
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181359 - 2017-09-21
. Jonathan D. Watts Circuit Court Judge, Br. 15 Safety Building 821 W State St Milwaukee, WI 53233
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181359 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or not he wanted to testify. … [D]id I specifically talk with him about the nature and effect of the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
or not he wanted to testify. … [D]id I specifically talk with him about the nature and effect of the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
should take jurisdiction. See RULE 809.51(1)(a)-(d); Smalley, 211 Wis. 2d 795 & n.7. The statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21
should take jurisdiction. See RULE 809.51(1)(a)-(d); Smalley, 211 Wis. 2d 795 & n.7. The statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the record, and he alleged that the “judge was prejudice[d]” and “bias[ed].” Although we did not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
on the record, and he alleged that the “judge was prejudice[d]” and “bias[ed].” Although we did not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(d) (2005-06). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33671 - 2008-08-12
is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(d) (2005-06). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33671 - 2008-08-12
State v. Lee Raven
conviction, Raven filed a “Motion to Vacate, Suppress, [and] Hear Tape Evidence” in which she “move[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25262 - 2006-05-24
conviction, Raven filed a “Motion to Vacate, Suppress, [and] Hear Tape Evidence” in which she “move[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25262 - 2006-05-24
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
satisfied its fact-finding duties when it “assume[d] that these [were] the facts.” We conclude, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
satisfied its fact-finding duties when it “assume[d] that these [were] the facts.” We conclude, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31