Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30401 - 30410 of 46941 for shows.
Search results 30401 - 30410 of 46941 for shows.
State v. John R. Martin
). The defendant bears the burden of showing, from the record, that a sentence is unreasonable. Id. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11309 - 2005-03-31
). The defendant bears the burden of showing, from the record, that a sentence is unreasonable. Id. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11309 - 2005-03-31
Thomas M. Spang v. Maureen A. Spang
638 (Ct. App. 1998). A court may modify maintenance only “upon a positive showing of a change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5127 - 2005-03-31
638 (Ct. App. 1998). A court may modify maintenance only “upon a positive showing of a change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
findings were inadequate. However, the evidence was sufficient. The various factors showing hardship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28592 - 2014-09-15
findings were inadequate. However, the evidence was sufficient. The various factors showing hardship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28592 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Adrian E. Stodola
witnesses and to show that the transcript yielded nothing to indicate Stodola had possessed the controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15
witnesses and to show that the transcript yielded nothing to indicate Stodola had possessed the controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15
State v. Benjamin M.B.
as harmless. SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE Benjamin argues that the State failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10559 - 2005-03-31
as harmless. SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE Benjamin argues that the State failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10559 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that there was surveillance video that would have showed that the officers’ testimony about what happened was not true. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107628 - 2014-02-04
that there was surveillance video that would have showed that the officers’ testimony about what happened was not true. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107628 - 2014-02-04
CA Blank Order
provided. See Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 274. If he or she does so, the State must show by clear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110987 - 2014-04-29
provided. See Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 274. If he or she does so, the State must show by clear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110987 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Alexis C.
, 625–627 (1991) (seizure occurs when person stops in response to a command of “show of authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2489 - 2017-09-19
, 625–627 (1991) (seizure occurs when person stops in response to a command of “show of authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2489 - 2017-09-19
Dan Paar v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
) (2001-02).[1] The definition of misconduct under § 108.04(5) is conduct that shows willful or wanton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7197 - 2005-03-31
) (2001-02).[1] The definition of misconduct under § 108.04(5) is conduct that shows willful or wanton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
implied that he used “an actual dangerous weapon” when the evidence showed that he used a pellet gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99746 - 2014-09-15
implied that he used “an actual dangerous weapon” when the evidence showed that he used a pellet gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99746 - 2014-09-15