Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30411 - 30420 of 63559 for records.
Search results 30411 - 30420 of 63559 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76223 - 2014-09-15
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76223 - 2014-09-15
Forest County v. Michael R.
that there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15602 - 2005-03-31
that there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15602 - 2005-03-31
State v. James F. Emerich
and recommended probation. However, the prosecutor also told the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2359 - 2005-03-31
and recommended probation. However, the prosecutor also told the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2359 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issues.2 Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522365 - 2022-05-17
issues.2 Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522365 - 2022-05-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and as a result the parole commission record was not sent to the circuit court for review. There is no record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352020 - 2021-04-01
, and as a result the parole commission record was not sent to the circuit court for review. There is no record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352020 - 2021-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2013AP2050-CRNM 2 review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107292 - 2017-09-21
are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2013AP2050-CRNM 2 review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107292 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651538 - 2023-05-02
2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651538 - 2023-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After considering the no- merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242370 - 2019-06-17
. After considering the no- merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242370 - 2019-06-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216622 - 2018-07-31
of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216622 - 2018-07-31
[PDF]
State v. Mikkel J. Goff
it “based on a cold record.” Id. In this case the postconviction motion was decided by the same judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4169 - 2017-09-20
it “based on a cold record.” Id. In this case the postconviction motion was decided by the same judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4169 - 2017-09-20