Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30421 - 30430 of 82830 for case search.
Search results 30421 - 30430 of 82830 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Gilberto Flores
. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On February 3, 1999, after pleading guilty to theft (movable property) in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3922 - 2017-09-20
. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On February 3, 1999, after pleading guilty to theft (movable property) in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3922 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
jurisdiction, but ultimately dismissed the case, explaining the court lacked procedures to resolve the matter
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368630 - 2021-05-17
jurisdiction, but ultimately dismissed the case, explaining the court lacked procedures to resolve the matter
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368630 - 2021-05-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
relief. He served his sentence and the case was closed. ¶3 Over five years later, on May 25, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32770 - 2014-09-15
relief. He served his sentence and the case was closed. ¶3 Over five years later, on May 25, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32770 - 2014-09-15
State v. Erica S.
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether a time deadline of reasonableness should be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2884 - 2012-01-12
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether a time deadline of reasonableness should be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2884 - 2012-01-12
State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5050 - 2007-04-04
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5050 - 2007-04-04
State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5051 - 2007-04-04
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5051 - 2007-04-04
State v. John A. Rupp
of $8,868.96. ¶5 On June 30, 1999, in an unrelated Fond du Lac county case, Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
of $8,868.96. ¶5 On June 30, 1999, in an unrelated Fond du Lac county case, Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Martin
from six cases which were disposed of by a single plea agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, John R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11311 - 2011-10-17
from six cases which were disposed of by a single plea agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, John R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11311 - 2011-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Pamela Smith-Herzog
). At a hearing on the motion, the State countered that a JNOV motion was inappropriate in a criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3498 - 2017-09-19
). At a hearing on the motion, the State countered that a JNOV motion was inappropriate in a criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3498 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122247 - 2014-09-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122247 - 2014-09-24