Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30421 - 30430 of 46131 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 30421 - 30430 of 46131 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. John G. Anderson
a preliminary breath test showed that Anderson had been drinking in violation of his probation, he became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
a preliminary breath test showed that Anderson had been drinking in violation of his probation, he became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presence and not upon a suspicion warranting further investigation, the appropriate test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123385 - 2017-09-21
presence and not upon a suspicion warranting further investigation, the appropriate test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123385 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
impaired driving and asked Dettmering to perform standardized field sobriety tests, but Dettmering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603258 - 2022-12-21
impaired driving and asked Dettmering to perform standardized field sobriety tests, but Dettmering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603258 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the Strickland test had not been met. See id. at 697. The court’s reasoning for the decision is unknown
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
of the Strickland test had not been met. See id. at 697. The court’s reasoning for the decision is unknown
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the Strickland test had not been met. See id. at 697. The court’s reasoning for the decision is unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
of the Strickland test had not been met. See id. at 697. The court’s reasoning for the decision is unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
Arlandis Issac v. Gerald A. Berge
the substantial evidence test, that is, whether reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19753 - 2005-09-28
the substantial evidence test, that is, whether reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19753 - 2005-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test for deficient performance is whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144334 - 2015-07-13
. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test for deficient performance is whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144334 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prong of the test because Bohanan could not have been prejudiced by his counsels’ performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181038 - 2017-09-21
prong of the test because Bohanan could not have been prejudiced by his counsels’ performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181038 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Chester A. Bahr and Lu Ann Bahr v. City of Sheboygan
not repeat these tests verbatim. It is sufficient to note that the three pronged "rule of reason" doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9571 - 2017-09-19
not repeat these tests verbatim. It is sufficient to note that the three pronged "rule of reason" doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9571 - 2017-09-19
Roxanne L. (Wong) Hefti v. Chun Wing Wong
the trial court focused exclusively on the extraordinary circumstances test, and deemed it unnecessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11328 - 2005-03-31
the trial court focused exclusively on the extraordinary circumstances test, and deemed it unnecessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11328 - 2005-03-31