Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30441 - 30450 of 62338 for child support.
Search results 30441 - 30450 of 62338 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. David G. Maddox
physical pain, the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. He argues, however, the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6094 - 2017-09-19
physical pain, the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. He argues, however, the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6094 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not supported by the record.” Specifically, Thomas contends that “[i]t is clear that the court viewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469840 - 2022-01-11
not supported by the record.” Specifically, Thomas contends that “[i]t is clear that the court viewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469840 - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
State v. Pierre Davis
the prosecutor make the recommendation in a manner that generates support for the recommendation. See Ferguson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9668 - 2017-09-19
the prosecutor make the recommendation in a manner that generates support for the recommendation. See Ferguson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9668 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 139, 456 N.W.2d 830 (1990). To determine whether a stop is supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61616 - 2014-09-15
, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 139, 456 N.W.2d 830 (1990). To determine whether a stop is supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61616 - 2014-09-15
State v. Julian C. Holt
. The prosecutor objected, contending that no evidence or testimony supported this theory. While the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9251 - 2005-03-31
. The prosecutor objected, contending that no evidence or testimony supported this theory. While the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9251 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
because the evidence supports application of the doctrine of inevitable discovery. Under that doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37636 - 2009-07-13
because the evidence supports application of the doctrine of inevitable discovery. Under that doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37636 - 2009-07-13
[PDF]
William Frederick Williams v. Rita Llanas (Williams)
was neither erroneous nor arbitrary; rather, it is a well-reasoned decision, supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13856 - 2014-09-15
was neither erroneous nor arbitrary; rather, it is a well-reasoned decision, supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13856 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
advised the court that she wished to withdraw from further representation of Harris. In support, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36153 - 2014-09-15
advised the court that she wished to withdraw from further representation of Harris. In support, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36153 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
” reading of Monahan is supported by opinions of other courts, both state and federal, which have concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17238 - 2005-03-31
” reading of Monahan is supported by opinions of other courts, both state and federal, which have concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17238 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of his vehicle was not supported by reasonable suspicion and, therefore, the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14
of his vehicle was not supported by reasonable suspicion and, therefore, the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14