Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30441 - 30450 of 59340 for quit claim deed.

COURT OF APPEALS
of certiorari claim. ¶12 Our review on certiorari is normally limited to whether the Board: “‘(1) acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50842 - 2010-06-14

WI APP 133 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2469 Complete Title o...
contained in their respective policies excluded any coverage to CBI for the claims alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102722 - 2013-12-15

[PDF] State v. David J. Cleveland
effective assistance of counsel. This court’s review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16108 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Glenn E. Davis
for the defendant’s version of how the crime occurred. ¶8 Davis claims that Briand and the other cases the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3197 - 2017-09-19

State v. William L. Brunton
for postconviction relief.[1] Brunton makes two claims: (1) the trial court erred in deciding that, on a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8505 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and awarded the Town $6,603 in attorney’s fees and costs. The Stilsons argue the Town’s small claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166067 - 2017-09-21

State v. David J. Cleveland
. This court’s review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16108 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment dismissing Steffen’s claims because genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31288 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the form of a statement by Woodley’s codefendant, Donovan Jones, which Woodley claims would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235442 - 2019-02-21

State v. Walter T. Missouri
seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Missouri claims: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21670 - 2006-04-25