Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30451 - 30460 of 50555 for our.
Search results 30451 - 30460 of 50555 for our.
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99709 - 2013-07-17
to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99709 - 2013-07-17
State v. Patricia A. Ziebell
, our supreme court directed the circuit court to exercise its discretion by examining the particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4241 - 2005-03-31
, our supreme court directed the circuit court to exercise its discretion by examining the particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the State’s motion to amend the Information after the State rested its case at trial. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183333 - 2017-09-21
the State’s motion to amend the Information after the State rested its case at trial. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183333 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Nathan O. Jones
. Contrary to Jones’s assertions, our conclusion does not conflict with either White v. State, 85 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
. Contrary to Jones’s assertions, our conclusion does not conflict with either White v. State, 85 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131229 - 2014-12-09
trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131229 - 2014-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
not indicate that the court considered the sentencing guidelines. Our analysis does not end here, however. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33254 - 2008-07-01
not indicate that the court considered the sentencing guidelines. Our analysis does not end here, however. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33254 - 2008-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
)5. [1] In our prior decision, we pointed out that the circuit court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113553 - 2014-06-02
)5. [1] In our prior decision, we pointed out that the circuit court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113553 - 2014-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315643 - 2020-12-22
that denied his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315643 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
medical examiner, Dr. James Foster. Upon our review of No. 2015AP209 2 the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161366 - 2017-09-21
medical examiner, Dr. James Foster. Upon our review of No. 2015AP209 2 the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161366 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
….” ¶11 Finally, we decline to exercise our statutory discretionary power of reversal pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09
….” ¶11 Finally, we decline to exercise our statutory discretionary power of reversal pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09