Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30461 - 30470 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30461 - 30470 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Thomas C. Smith
a judgment and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. He argues: (1) the court erred when it answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73904 - 2011-11-14
denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. He argues: (1) the court erred when it answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73904 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
WI 16
Shortly thereafter, the State filed a motion for summary judgment. As grounds, it asserted that "[t]he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78794 - 2014-09-15
Shortly thereafter, the State filed a motion for summary judgment. As grounds, it asserted that "[t]he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 53
the motion, applying the newly revised version of the class certification rule, WIS. STAT. § 803.08, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245210 - 2019-10-04
the motion, applying the newly revised version of the class certification rule, WIS. STAT. § 803.08, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245210 - 2019-10-04
[PDF]
James A. Finch v. Southside Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
The trial court terminated this litigation at the pleading stage by granting motions to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5717 - 2017-09-19
The trial court terminated this litigation at the pleading stage by granting motions to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5717 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
and that any violation was caused by the DOT. ¶17 Shortly thereafter, the State filed a motion for summary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78794 - 2012-02-27
and that any violation was caused by the DOT. ¶17 Shortly thereafter, the State filed a motion for summary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78794 - 2012-02-27
Frontsheet
On August 7, 2001, the circuit court in the divorce action held a hearing on a motion filed by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29091 - 2007-05-16
On August 7, 2001, the circuit court in the divorce action held a hearing on a motion filed by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29091 - 2007-05-16
State v. David S. Leighton
additionally appeals from the denial of his postconviction motions. ¶2 Leighton argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16075 - 2005-03-31
additionally appeals from the denial of his postconviction motions. ¶2 Leighton argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16075 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David S. Leighton
motions. No. 99-2614-CR 2 ¶1 CANE, C.J. David Leighton appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21
motions. No. 99-2614-CR 2 ¶1 CANE, C.J. David Leighton appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 162
his pro se postconviction motion to vacate the DNA surcharge. BACKGROUND I. Prior Dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56197 - 2010-12-19
his pro se postconviction motion to vacate the DNA surcharge. BACKGROUND I. Prior Dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56197 - 2010-12-19