Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30461 - 30470 of 62809 for child support.
Search results 30461 - 30470 of 62809 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
withdrawal motions, Strong cited several reasons supporting plea withdrawal, including assertions that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89893 - 2012-11-29
withdrawal motions, Strong cited several reasons supporting plea withdrawal, including assertions that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89893 - 2012-11-29
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Defere
. ¶8 On appeal, Defere argues that the facts do not support an emergency rule exception to the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5941 - 2017-09-19
. ¶8 On appeal, Defere argues that the facts do not support an emergency rule exception to the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5941 - 2017-09-19
City of Shullsburg v. Ronald L. Monahan
, he used his left hand for support against the vehicle. As he walked to the rear of the car, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31
, he used his left hand for support against the vehicle. As he walked to the rear of the car, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sean W. Ottman
because the two charges were unrelated. See id. at 395. ¶11 Gavigan does not support the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15975 - 2017-09-21
because the two charges were unrelated. See id. at 395. ¶11 Gavigan does not support the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addresses the following potential issues: whether there was sufficient credible evidence to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261931 - 2020-05-27
addresses the following potential issues: whether there was sufficient credible evidence to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261931 - 2020-05-27
State v. Larry B. Hooker
hearing was inadmissible and insufficient to support a finding of probable cause; (2) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6494 - 2005-03-31
hearing was inadmissible and insufficient to support a finding of probable cause; (2) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Bell was procedurally barred from bringing another § 974.06 motion. In support of its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
that Bell was procedurally barred from bringing another § 974.06 motion. In support of its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective under Cronic because the facts supporting Ewers’ eventual disbarment had already occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251796 - 2019-12-26
ineffective under Cronic because the facts supporting Ewers’ eventual disbarment had already occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251796 - 2019-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether the commission’s factual findings regarding estoppel were supported by substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103127 - 2013-10-16
is whether the commission’s factual findings regarding estoppel were supported by substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103127 - 2013-10-16
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
support for his original postconviction motion and also sought to supplement his original postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31
support for his original postconviction motion and also sought to supplement his original postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31