Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30461 - 30470 of 62306 for child support.
Search results 30461 - 30470 of 62306 for child support.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
for revocation and the facts supporting the previous alternative to revocation. At the sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95391 - 2014-09-15
for revocation and the facts supporting the previous alternative to revocation. At the sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that would support a motion to modify Pearson’s sentence. Counsel explains that he has found no factual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219642 - 2018-09-20
that would support a motion to modify Pearson’s sentence. Counsel explains that he has found no factual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219642 - 2018-09-20
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
” reading of Monahan is supported by opinions of other courts, both state and federal, which have concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17238 - 2005-03-31
” reading of Monahan is supported by opinions of other courts, both state and federal, which have concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inferences drawn by the court, and we search the record for evidence to support its findings. Global Steel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812343 - 2024-06-12
inferences drawn by the court, and we search the record for evidence to support its findings. Global Steel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812343 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
State v. William J. Westerman
, the State makes no specific argument in support of their admission. It argues instead that any error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6884 - 2017-09-20
, the State makes no specific argument in support of their admission. It argues instead that any error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6884 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Robert L. Worthon, Jr. v. Gerald A
- there was insufficient evidence to support the determination and on the ground that the punishment was excessive. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7939 - 2017-09-19
- there was insufficient evidence to support the determination and on the ground that the punishment was excessive. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7939 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, and underlining omitted.). He claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14
, and underlining omitted.). He claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, and the denial of the suppression motion was proper, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905105 - 2025-01-28
stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, and the denial of the suppression motion was proper, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905105 - 2025-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was not probable cause to support his arrest for operating while intoxicated and that regardless, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76641 - 2014-09-15
that there was not probable cause to support his arrest for operating while intoxicated and that regardless, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76641 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Elizabeth M. Gibson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
does not support the verdict and the Gibsons’ attorney improperly informed the jury of the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11026 - 2017-09-19
does not support the verdict and the Gibsons’ attorney improperly informed the jury of the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11026 - 2017-09-19